9/20

Forensics and the Future

Forensics and the Future

10 mins

The application of science and technology in policing is perhaps most clearly visible to the public in forensic science. While the UK’s rich academic history in forensic science is well-recognised, there is also a game-changing set of innovations on the horizon. The forensic science community is well-versed in these innovations, but many others are not, and funding is required to maximise the opportunity.

Historically we’ve led the way says Dr. Carolyn Lovell, Head of Research, Office of the Police Chief Scientific Adviser: “Our renown in forensic science, is in DNA, the development of the DNA database, and we’re celebrating 30 years of the DNA database this year. We really revolutionised how we investigate crimes with DNA. It’s been quite a journey over those 30 years.”

Shelley Wilson, Research and Innovation Lead, Forensic Capability Network agrees, saying: “Historically the UK have been early adopters of forensic science, leading the development of new capabilities. Our 43 police forces are underpinned by standardised legislation and working practices making us a natural home for embedding new science.”

Dr. Rachel Bolton-King, Associate Professor of Forensic Science, Nottingham Trent University adds: “It is important that those working in forensic science are able to communicate how current practices and latest innovations can be used to enhance policing, making our streets and communities safer. Similarly, strengthening collaborations and partnerships between academia and practice will maximise the potential implementation and impact of scientific research moving forwards.”

Looking forward to a new science cycle

New future-focused frontiers across forensic science are being forged, and the cross-pollination of ideas from medicine, academia, private sector and international policing is driving innovation across physical and digital forensic science.

For example, pending further research and development, drones will potentially be used by police officers for crime scene investigation. One such system dubbed ‘AirCSI’ 1 presents an innovative approach to crime scene investigation by minimising human interference and leveraging autonomous aerial systems. The approach integrates object detection algorithms trained to identify relevant items such as human bodies and weapons - with trajectory planning to ensure comprehensive coverage of the scene.

Imaging across forensics has made strides forward. For example, handheld, multi spectral and hyper spectral imaging systems, which use multiple bands across the electromagnetic spectrum (beyond visible wavelength bands) are now on the market2. This portability means these devices work well in covert operations, can be used in light and dark conditions and have faster at the scene processing without destroying evidence.

For more controlled, indoor, crime scenes we will have the ability to deploy integrated tools which not only quickly capture and share 3D imagery but also using sensing capabilities be able to combine other trace evidence it identifies like finger-marks, body fluids and air borne material providing investigative teams with ‘real-time’ forensic evidence. In 2020, Horizon Europe funded RISEN, the real-time on site forensic trace qualification project. This collaboration with academics across Europe tested the principle and deliver of realistic crime scene capture, with real-time trace detection, visualisation and identification without destroying evidence, all in an immersive 3D environment3. This was achieved through the production of 3D image capture with live feed capabilities, eight different sensors and a unique digital asset management system.

Next steps for visual tools already being used by forces have been explored by the Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science. They are exploring the feasibility of a system that captures high-resolution, complex spatial data of indoor and outdoor scenes, which are then transmitted to a cloud computer via 5G. A crime scene in 3D can then be rapidly constructed and delivered via Virtuality Reality headsets. Current methods for VR generation take several hours, however 5G connectivity will bring this down rapidly and enable forensic investigators to experience a fully immersive scene4,5.

This type of technology is already being used by some forces, but the UK faces barriers to fully rolling this out, including the size of data files and available funding. Once, and if, an integrated Cloud structure exists across all policing, it could become more widely adopted.

Another study6 explores exciting developments in the use of microRNA (miRNA) profiling and AI in age estimation. Age estimation is one of the most important components in the practice of forensic science, especially for body fluids or stains at crime scenes which can be compromised or difficult to collect. The study uses massive parallel sequencing and machine learning models like AdaBoost to enable age estimation even from compromised bloodstains – the pilot points to the possibility of this new approach providing vital leads when traditional DNA analysis falls short.

An example of how fingerprint innovations are being applied can be seen in the case of drug dealer Carl Stewart, 39, who was identified after he shared a photo of himself holding a block of cheese on the encrypted messaging service EncroChat, from which police were able to analyse his fingerprints7. His fingerprints were visible on the surface of the stilton but lifting these from a digital image wouldn’t have been possible without new technology available to policing.

 

Concept image generated with AI.

Innovative approaches to evidence interpretation are also being explored in the field of forensic firearm examination. For example, using x-ray fluorescence to assess authenticity, and machine learning to calculate likelihood ratios after automated comparison of 3D digital images of fired cartridge cases5. However, to train, test and validate complex computational models for use in casework, much larger datasets and significant funding is required. Rachel says: “Without funding, we risk never being able to adopt such innovative and needed solutions into practice.“

Our Scientific Pedigree

The application of science and technology in policing is perhaps most clearly visible to the public in forensic science. While the UK’s rich academic history in forensic science is well-recognised, there is also a game-changing set of innovations on the horizon.

Historically we’ve led the way says Dr. Carolyn Lovell, Head of Research, Office of the Police Chief Scientific Adviser, National Police Chiefs’ Council: “Our renown in forensic science, is in DNA, the development of the DNA database, and we’re celebrating 30 years of the DNA database this year. We really revolutionised how we investigate crimes with DNA. It’s been quite a journey over those 30 years.”

Shelley Wilson, Research and Innovation Lead, NPCC Forensic Capability Network agrees, saying: “The UK has been early adopters of forensic science. Culturally we are well set up for being early adopters of forensic science because we like to work in a methodical structured way and our policing environment is also set up well. We work to one legislation nationally. We might have 43 forces, but we do work to one policing legislation that allows us to therefore roll things out nationally.”

Looking further into the outer reaches of forensics…

The creatively named NOS.E9 (effectively an electronic nose) is emerging as a powerful tool for detecting decomposed remains, offering a chemical-sensing alternative to cadaver dogs. Cadaver-detection dogs, while highly effective, are limited by their cost, limited operation times, and lack of granular information reported to the handler. The novel electronic nose (e-nose) technology, such as the NOS.E device offers a sensor-based approach which is able to detect human decomposition over extended periods. In controlled studies, the NOS.E was able to identify the presence of a surface-deposited individual throughout most stages of decomposition, with its sensitivity influenced by environmental factors like wind. Importantly, the NOS.E demonstrated its usefulness by detecting bodies days, and even weeks, after death, highlighting its potential as a practical and scalable tool for forensic investigations where traditional canine methods can fall short.

A new Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system10 which is being tested by academics would enable police to work with witnesses to generate forensic facial composites directly from EEG signals (brain electrical activity picked up by sensors on the scalp) and matched against criminal databases. This overcomes the limitations of previous suspect identification methodologies by bypassing the need for verbal descriptions or memory-based sketches and dramatically accelerates and enhances the accuracy of suspect identification.

That said, despite all the opportunities presented by research and development and new technologies, there are potential challenges ahead. Firstly, the correct innovations must be prioritised with funding and focus. Secondly, the way in which the innovations are rolled out and eventually delivered on the frontline must also be considered.

To effectively embed new innovations into forensic work, it’s essential to draw on lessons from the past. The challenges policing has encountered in keeping up with advances in digital forensics, a vital strand of forensics, offer valuable insights. The shift brought about by digital forensics was a major change, much like the transformation we are now anticipating for the future.

Learning from our past

The introduction of digital forensics represented a major shift in policing and was accompanied by significant challenges. A 2022 report11 from HMICFRS (His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services) found that “the police service hasn’t kept pace with the scale of the challenges they face. In some cases, we found that the police simply didn’t understand what digital forensics meant. We found a national backlog of over 25,000 devices waiting to be examined. This didn’t include all the devices likely to be in the system.”

The report also found an asymmetry of skills and expertise saying: “some forces are leading the way with their improved response to crimes with digital forensic evidence and the treatment of victims. But we found little evidence of this being more widely shared and adopted by others.”

Shelley points to one example of a structural requirement impacting digital forensics which we may continue to face as new innovations rollout: “For example, one of our challenges in digital forensics is that to ensure the safe storage of personal data whilst securing accurate evidence digital forensic material sits in silo to their local police computer systems. Operationally having digital forensics ‘air gapped’ from other police systems can make it harder to analyse and review evidence with investigation teams at pace.”

So, with so many potential innovations on the horizon, policing must surely take note of the challenges from the recent past. Keeping pace with S&T challenges, building the science profession across forces, avoiding data siloes and supporting structural changes requires investment, plus a systemic and mindset shift.

Scientific principles on the frontline

Shelley also reflects: “Within forensics, we apply scientific rigour to what we examine to ensure that it’s fit for the criminal justice process; to ensure the integrity of all evidential forensic material.

Physical forensic disciplines are built on traditional scientific principles with known trusted research and development methodology that has supported a natural integration of science into policing practice. Differently, digital forensics has evolved without those scientific development principles being consistently embedded and established from the outset. Different maturity levels of physical and digital forensic sciences make ensuring comparable scientific rigour across forensic in policing more challenging.”

The difference highlighted by Shelley provides a useful roadmap for the importance of scientific principles being deployed across policing for the future rollout of new technologies and science. As we begin to integrate new technology at crime scenes that can support ‘real-time’ forensic examinations, embedding scientific principles into policing practice and rolling out of new technology will be more important than ever. 

Looking to the future with optimism

It’s clear that there are exciting innovations being explored and tested. The question is around which will be adopted for national policing and how officers will be supported to use them on the ground. Rachel highlights “There are exciting opportunities for us to strengthen the use, value and impact of science and technology in policing through the newly funded Policing Academic Centres of Excellence. However, for this vision to be exploited, greater strategic alignment is needed between forensic science and policing.”

Carolyn says: “There is a well-established forensic community. We can capitalise on what we’ve got…whether the emerging opportunities of AI and machine learning to help us with our physical forensic activity and streamlining of our work. But also in the imaging field, 3D technology, virtual, near scene technology. In particular rapid technologies (including rapid field testing) are going to make a big impact. It is also worth noting that we need to look at our international colleagues and learn where they are applying new processes and take some learning from this and industry partners.”

“We have such high demand for our forensic science service in the UK. We care about the service and quality standards for forensic sciences.

I think that gives us an advantage in wanting to adopt new forensic science and make a difference. The continued high demand for forensics across policing shows the value this science adds to investigations. Having passionate forensics scientists who care about ensuring we continue to secure the best forensic evidence for policing is exciting for the adoption of new science and technology.”

Shelley Wilson, Research and Innovation Lead, NPCC Forensic Capability Network

Dr. Carolyn Lovell
Head of Research, Office of the Police Chief Scientific Adviser
National Police Chiefs’ Council

Shelley Wilson
Research and Innovation Lead
NPCC Forensic Capability Network

1. Araújo, Pompílio Jr., Mendonça, Marcelo, Fontinele, Jefferson, & Oliveira, Luciano, Towards Autonomous Investigation of Crime Scene by Using Drones, 2019, https://www.sensorsportal.com/HTML/DIGEST/june_2019/Vol_234/P_3089.pdf.

2. SMYTEC Ltd, Blindsite: Augmented Reality Navigation Safety System, n.d., https://www.smytec-ltd.com/blindsite/.

3. RISEN (H2020 project consortium), RISEN: Resilience-Increasing Strategies for Environments at Night, n.d., https://www.risen-h2020.eu/.

4. University of Dundee, 5G Virtual Reality Crime Scene Capture Project, 2024, https://www.dundee.ac.uk/projects/5g-virtual-reality-crime-scene-capture.

5. Zappalà, A., Guarnera, L., Rinaldi, V., Livatino, S., & Battiato, S., Deep Learning for Crime Scene Reconstruction from Multi-View Imagery, 2024, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.18458.pdf.

6. Esposito, M., Sessa, F., Cocimano, G., Zuccarello, P., Roccuzzo, S., & Salerno, M., Advances in Technologies in Crime Scene Investigation, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203169.

7. BBC News, Cheese Photo Leads to Liverpool Drug Dealer’s Downfall, 2021, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-57226165.

8. Basu, N., Bolton-King, R. S., & Morrison, G. S., Forensic Comparison of Fired Cartridge Cases: Feature-Extraction Methods for Feature-Based Calculation of Likelihood Ratios, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100272.

9. Brown, A., Lamb, E., Deo, A., Pasin, D., Liu, T., Zhang, W., Su, S., & Ueland, M., The Use of Novel Electronic Nose Technology to Locate Missing Persons for Criminal Investigations, 2023, https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/169787.

10. Suganthi, J., Sivaranjani, S., & Hariharan, M., Forensic Art with Image Recognition and Brain Computing Interface, 2023, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10084031.

11. Suganthi, J., Sivaranjani, S., & Hariharan, M., Forensic Art with Image Recognition and Brain Computing Interface, 2023, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10084031.

12.His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services (HMICFRS), How Well the Police and Other Agencies Use Digital Forensics in Their Investigations, 2025, https://hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publications/how-well-the-police-and-other-agencies-use-digital-forensics-in-their-investigations/.

Top
Previous Article 08.

• 5 mins

A Safer Future for Women and Girls: Victim Care

Next Article 10.

• 2 mins

Ben Snuggs KPM, Chair National Science and Innovation Board